Struggling with very difficult scripture

In Numbers 15:32-36 there is an account of a man found gathering firewood on the Sabbath. His action was contravening the law concerning what should be done on the Sabbath day and so he was brought to Moses for judgement. In versus 35-36 it states: ‘Then the Lord said to Moses, “The man must die. The whole assembly must stone him outside the camp.” So the assembly took him outside the camp and stoned him to death, as the Lord commanded Moses.’

How do we respond to this apparently shocking command from God? One response would be to ignore it and confine it to the dustbin of Old Testament history. Why? On the very straightforward grounds that, surely, this is a barbaric and extreme judgement for such a small misdemeanor, and, in any case, as Christians, we are subject to a new covenant with God which is not bound to follow these kinds of rules and regulations. Instead, we follow Christ’s instructions in Mark 2:27 which proclaims: ‘the Sabbath was made for human beings, not human beings for the Sabbath’, and thereby making a clear distance between ourselves and ancient history; and we can do this, in the name of Christ (not Moses). Another response would be more subtle, and is typically used in many sermons I have heard. That is, to concede to the first response, but add something like, even though it would not be right to stone people to death for these kinds of reasons today, the truth of God’s lesson in his command at the time, still carries weight for us today, metaphorically speaking. So, God’s word in our lives demands obedience over all aspects of our lives, including the small things.  The lesson is that if we don’t look after the small things of obedience we will never be able to obey God in the big things. The third response would be to try and defend God’s original command at the time, and so defend it ‘head-on’, as it were. Often this response relies on scholarly interpretation of scripture backed-up with historical knowledge to explain why, at the time, the stoning would be the only sensible option, and so understandable and justifiable, given the context. So, although on a superficial reading, the act of gathering firewood looks trivial from our point of view, the man would have been willfully and defiantly giving the 'proverbial finger' to both God and the community he was part of, by gathering firewood. This act of willful defiance, then, demanded an extreme response. In addition, God, in other parts of the Old Testament, often showed mercy toward wrong-doers, but there were other times when a more harsh judgement was needed, in order to set an example to the rest of God’s people. 

Of course, you have to make up your own mind about the response you would make to this kind of very difficult scripture. For my part, and for what it’s worth, I think there are various truths in all the responses above, and so we need to take all the positions seriously, and meditate and reflect on them accordingly. Most importantly though, we need to take these responses and our own preference (whatever which way) to God in prayer, anticipating that he will allow us and prompt us to grow and change through these meditations. Moreover, in the process, we must give ourselves permission to struggle with God in these prayers and meditations, and to not expect, or rely on, ready-made once-and-for all ‘solutions’ to these difficult questions and issues (also see my 22nd December 2013 post - Why struggling and resting with God go hand-in-hand).  

Finally, and only by way of example (and so not an answer as such), one of my prayerful struggles with this scripture, finished with me complaining: “But God, even if it was right for the man to be stoned to death thereby demonstrating your uncompromising character (which, if I am honest, I still now hesitate over); and even if the man was willfully and even perhaps dangerously defiant, I, as a Christian (and as a follower of your Son), would still want to exercise mercy, and even to be there with him as he was stoned to death!" God’s response to this complaint, shut me up and also made me laugh, given his response was so surprising and decisive: “Don’t you think I was there with him? You will never understand fully my ways and often they seem crazy to you for sure (and for good reason), but don’t believe that I wasn’t in pain when he was being stoned; just as I was in pain when my Son was nailed to the cross and left to die.” Where this response from God to me leaves it all, I don't know, but it has certainly given me something to chew on that's for certain!

Click on book cover image on this blog's home page for information on my book Nine Steps to Well-Being: A Spiritual Guide for Disconnected Christians and Other Questioning Journeyers - first three chapters are FREE!! 

Comments

  1. Steve, you're right - it's a very difficult Scripture (as many others are). Truly, God's response is: "My ways are not your ways." As God speaks through the prophet, "I take no delight in the death of the wicked." It's the same issue with Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5. It's seems harsh, and hard to understand. But I believe that God is love, even in these harsh realities.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How would you respond to Timothy Blaisdell's even harder scripture below? Sorry, for passing the buck, but I'm interested in getting a debate going on this issue?

      Delete
  2. Yes to the above - very insightful - thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. To me, this passage is nothing compared to Numbers 31.

    There we have described for us a scene in which, as the army of the Lord returns from battle, Moses is angry with them for allowing the women to live. Shame on them! These are the same women who "enticed the Israelites to be unfaithful"! How dare they!

    So, to make things right, Moses commands that every woman who's not a virgin be killed on the spot. In addition, there were also apparently some boys that had been spared, and Moses commands that they all be put to death. But, says Moses, "save for yourselves every virgin girl."

    Now, let's imagine this scene. Young boys' bloody corpses are lying around, along with the corpses of women and mothers. The young girls are now forced to become the slaves of the men who had just slaughtered their fathers and mothers.

    But that's not all. First these men must determine which ones are virgins. The Lord has commanded it, so it must be done. Were they made to line up for this inspection? Were these soldiers gentle with the young maidens as they inspected them? What a story for Sunday School class, huh?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts